thoughts about public (online) conversations and virtual identity

This is a comment on David Nassar’s clipmark titled “huffPo with a Social Network

“…continuous connection among your public and private conversations.”

Yes, but do we need more?

Even with our communication (over)loaded with tools, the problem still remains: how the hell do we recognise & identify friends (and foes) on the worldwide web? By real photo or by avatar? By real name or by nickname?

Real life networks are not the same as online communities. The rules are different. The level of trust is different. The way we share information is different.

Think about what it means to have a real face. It’s part of your real life ID and part of your ‘login’ to your networks. ‘Friends of my face’ receive private information. Others just get to know my face. In other words, this part of my real ID is public, but the information I share, is not (by me).

Online communities act in opposite direction: Information is made public with the intention to share it with a general public. Having no control over information once made public also means using a virtual ID which contains less or none details about my personal identity.

So, “continuous connection among your public and private conversationswould only make sense when real life ID and virtual ID(‘s) remain separated throughout the whole proces of sharing. In case of online public conversations, this poses a dilemma.

How do I conversate on a personal or dedicated level, without compromising the safety of a public (virtual) ID?

At some point I might want to share some personal info with someone on twitter, myspace, facebook etc. I may have an option to send a private message, but what if someone posts a message, asking if I’m this person X (my name)? I cannot protect myself against that. I also don’t have time to check all messages.

Another dilemma concerns the continuity of virtual ID’s.

I use different nicknames, emailadresses, accounts etc, and all are highly dedicated to the type of conversation or contact. They’re not as static (read: continuous) as my real life personal details. Of course, most social networking services are designed to interweave public profiles. But using different profiles means there is a break in the continuity of my online identity.

Example: I love to take part in online public discussions. But there are times that I want to change my profile. For instance, when I started conversation under an anonymous alias, and things turn out to become interesting enough to present myself as a business, I wished I had used my business profile from the start. Unfortunately, I cannot change the virtual ID in reverse.

So here we have the difference between real life (RL) and online (OL) conversation:

RL: using a single, personal, continuous ID to share (private) information only with people I trust.
OL: using different virtual, incomplete ID’s to share (non-private) information worldwide

In order to maintain the separation, but also having “…continuous connection among your public and private conversations.“, we must find a way to overcome the problem of discontinuity of our virtual ID.

At this point I don’t have a solution. But I like to think about this. Maybe some smart people will come up with an idea :-).


Sorting out garbage like a geek

Sorting algorithms. They’re pretty geeky, and you probably don’t want me to tell why. Fair enough. Most wise kids stay far from it.

But I read this somewhere (don’t ask) and it kept spinning in my head the past few days:

“People overfocus on efficiency over clarity and simplicity. And most of the time the environment you’re coding in will have an efficient sort function built-in anyway.”

Read the rest of this entry »

Facing Your (first) Critics

This entry is also posted as comment to the blog post of Celine Roque on Web Worker Daily, titled Better Web Working: Facing Your Critics

When my first pieces of work went public, I was still in high school. I painted, wrote poetry, plays and articles and did performances with my band. But although the hard bit of learning, exposing en rejection extended far beyond the class room, it never felt as scary or painful as it did later.

Read the rest of this entry »

Blogs need to be imperfect, just like my CV

The blog issue is doing a great job of killing me.
Well, not literally, but it drains creative energy, leaving my head numb and my hands feeble as much as the all-feared white sheet of paper can inspire sudden death to the writer. Blogging is dangerous. If you want to make it perfect.

"danger" []

I started blogging as a way – or a mission – to recollect my thinkings. Now, two weeks later, this whole blogging thing is pushing me to the edge of maddening doubt, where beyond that, all things go bananas or will become one. It has all to do with dullness, the Medusa effect and, of course, advertisement. Don’t worry, by the end you’ll know what I mean. But let me explain the cause of the problem first.

Read the rest of this entry »

Odd things

This post is in response to the blog post of Celine Roque, titled “Creative Exercise #1: The “Odd Things” Tickler”

The Odd Things this week are:
[1] the meaning of serious
[2] writing pads (what else)
[3] a rumour about time zones

Read the rest of this entry »

Second but not last post

Blogging seemed such a nice thing to do. The right thing also. It should have helped me, like keeping thoughts and remarks together in a certain coherent structure thingy. But it instantly presented a new, bigger and far more essential problem to me: in which language do I write?

Read the rest of this entry »

My first post

OK, have mercy. This is all new and potentially disastrous to me. Please leave a note, preferably near the edge of this swamp, so I know in which direction to drown. It’s for the dramatic effect you see. Thanks in advance.h